Post-election-day bullspunk
Nov. 6th, 2002 12:25 pmYou know, I don't expect everyone to be happy about the results, but I do expect people to buckle down and cope.
Waaah, the Republicans are in power. Waaaah! It's a conspiracy! Waaaaaaaaaaah! Waaaaah, I should move to Canada!
Yes, yes you should. Please move to Canada. Move there and spare me your noise.
Waaah, the Republicans are in power. Waaaah! It's a conspiracy! Waaaaaaaaaaah! Waaaaah, I should move to Canada!
Yes, yes you should. Please move to Canada. Move there and spare me your noise.
no subject
Date: 2002-11-06 11:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-11-06 12:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-11-06 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-11-06 04:34 pm (UTC)I think it sucks, truthfully. I mean, how do you cope constructively with this? "Gee, I voted against you, but your asstastic presence disgraces me still. Won't you just hurry up and die?" :o)
no subject
Date: 2002-11-06 04:50 pm (UTC)Exercise your strength as a voter in the next election and while doing so make people aware of the issues, the candidates and their own strength so that they vote too. It cascades.
I could go on, but it's not my problem. Above all I'm making the point that I'm fucking tired of hearing people bitch, and I'm particulary sick of the old whinge about moving to Canada. It's tired and it's lamer than a 34-year-old nag with founder standing in the rain. It's like listening to one kid threatening another with "Give me your candy money or I'll... I'll... I'll do something you won't like!" As a threat or a promise it has absolutely no force to it -- it's just something people say when they can't come up with anything really meaningful to say when they're faced with the fact their team lost, pure and simple.
no subject
Date: 2002-11-06 04:54 pm (UTC)Dude
Date: 2002-11-06 09:55 pm (UTC)Why?
Date: 2002-11-06 10:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-11-07 02:34 am (UTC)Re: Dude
Date: 2002-11-07 06:07 am (UTC)I don't love the results, because I don't see eye-to-eye with the Republicans on a number of issues that I think are important (I'm definately a fan of the independents that run because they tend to reflect my views a lot more closely) but I align with them a lot more than I do the Democratic party. So I definately am not hurt to see the Republicans getting the balance of power shifted to them.
Which is ironic, considering my upbringing on the farm. I mean, when you look back at the history of the party there was a time not so long ago that the Democratic party used to be the party of choice for farmers and "the common people."
no subject
Date: 2002-11-07 08:21 am (UTC)I suppose what I found most annoying over the whole "Oh no! The Republicans have control over the Congress and the White House, lets move to Canada!" thing is that people assume simply the absolute worst conspiracy theory that somehow this would mean some sort of automatic push into some theocratic, fundamentalist, dictatorship. I suppose they have been saturated by their own propaganda so thoroughly instead of really looking at the voted in congressmen or actually checking the party platform that such a concept is actually plausible, nay probable in their warped minds.
Considering historically when either party in the past (and we can look simply at post WW2 America for this) had the majority in both the legislature and executive that the nation did not suddenly fall into some right or left wing dictatorship, such fears are rather unfounded. Besides, the Congress wouldn't be a rubber stamp for a single party's agenda simply because the majority isn't large enough, have they ever heard of the 'filibuster'? Bi-partican cooperation will still be needed on many issues.
Perhaps they need to read less conspiracy Internet billboards and more actually factual research, but that may be hoping too much.
Personally I only worry for my home state of Illinois, the new governor had promise what is literally hundreds of millions of dollars in new programs and increases in others. The concern being that the money simply is not there as the state budget is one billion in the hole. He will either have to break those promises wholeheartedly, completely strip other programs for the needed cash or majority raise taxes.
no subject
Date: 2002-11-07 09:27 am (UTC)One of the thing that annoys me most while reading, say, vote-smart.org or anything like that, is to read candidates' positions who talk about increasing funding to programs x, y, and z, but neither about a) raising taxes or raising taxes enough to make up for the spending or b) cutting funding to other programs. The same thing when they're talking live. Hi, not a big fan of debt over here.
Stupid stupid stupid!
Re: Why?
Date: 2002-11-07 03:16 pm (UTC)--Kit
Re: Why?
Date: 2002-11-07 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-11-07 11:14 pm (UTC)I'm not fundamentally opposed to tax increases, much less to increases which fund something that's necessary, but there're a lot of things that are not necessary.
no subject
Date: 2002-11-07 11:15 pm (UTC)All they do is simply double all the toll roads' charges! :o)
I may be wrong, but haven't those roads been paid for for years? I remember going thru the De Kalb and Dixon toll booths when I was a kid, and now, 22yr later, they're STILL there!
Really, as for the promises, they'll probably do a combination of all three in a carefully crafted manner, so they don't lose votes next time.
no subject
Date: 2002-11-08 08:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-11-08 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-11-08 10:13 pm (UTC)Re: Dude
Date: 2002-11-08 10:47 pm (UTC)I'm not partisan in any ordinary sense. I am just being taxed to pieces, and the rates get higher decade after decade without fail. Gah!
After a brief period of being a no-tax-too-high Democrat (sadly, there aren't many who aren't in that category lately) in college, I'm basically a SMALL-"L" libertarian ... but I vote GOP in many races because that is the best chance of stopping the greatest overall harm to me and my interests.
And yes, a problem with my being GOP is that most Republicans do not cotton to furs ... let alone furs who life-model. I'd say fewer than 5% of furs would call themselves political conservatives ... that fewer than 5% of life models would do so ... and that there are fewer than 10 lawyers who are life models who like anthropomorphic shtuff in the WORLD.
And nine of THEM are gay.
Which makes me a misfit all over the place. :]
no subject
Date: 2002-11-10 03:24 am (UTC)They don't realize that republicans and democrats are both mostly beholden to big business interests these days, and aside from a couple of issues, are both moving to the center and even if their idealogies aren't the same, run things in an almost identical manner
They like to blame people with the guts to vote green, libertarian, or independent for the loss of their candidates, instead of blaming the candidates for alienating these voters by their moves towards the mushy center
They don't realize that this is just a big chance for the republicans to fuck up, which they will, and that republicans doing well in THIS election gives us a good 75% chance we'll see democrats regain control of a lot of stuff in 2004. Even without the impending second recession my nutso yet often-correct boyfriend keeps talking about.
P.S. Canada is lame.