Just shut up, will you?
Jul. 16th, 2005 05:16 amEveryone posting "OMG Oh Emm Gee OMG no spoilers!!!!!111!!!1!1111eleventyone" for the new Harry Potter: shut up. Cock in the mouth. Just gargle on it and shut the everloving christ up. That goes double for you people who've gone to the length of using an image banner in your ravings so as to achieve that perfect level of obnoxiousness. It's cool that you're excited and I can sympathize to an extent, but I've never seen the collective IQ of LiveJournal drop so sharply in such a short period of time over something people might do but haven't yet.
If people put as much energy into our political systems as they are putting into preemptive wrath for spoilers of a children's novel, our world would be a hell of a lot better place.
Normally I love you folks, but right now a good portion of you are just being a complete bunch of spasmos.
If people put as much energy into our political systems as they are putting into preemptive wrath for spoilers of a children's novel, our world would be a hell of a lot better place.
Normally I love you folks, but right now a good portion of you are just being a complete bunch of spasmos.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 11:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 11:10 am (UTC)I tried watching one of the movies with some friends, but was left utterly distinterested. To each their own, I guess.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 05:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 01:35 pm (UTC)I'm more figuring out how I'm going to take the kids to see Charlie and the Chocolate Factory between a bike ride and a possible cookout.
Oh yeah, kids, that's a good excuse, I have to read the book so I can engage the kids in conversation.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 02:45 pm (UTC)The answer persuaded me to avoid any further interaction. :)
However, as this is LJ, drama is always the order of the day.
Thanks for providing the anti-drama drama. :D (Meant to be funny, not mean)
-DH
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 04:28 pm (UTC)Obviously it's not because people are pissed that people *might* do it... it's because they're pissed because people have done it with past books, and they don't want a *repeat occurance*.
It probably didn't take them as long to write up their "Don't ruin the book for me" posts as it took you to write up your complaint about it - I'd personally rather that they *didn't* spend as much time on politics as they did on writing that post, but instead would devote an actually /significant/ portion of time towards being intelligent voters.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 04:40 pm (UTC)Who's the spaz again?
Date: 2005-07-16 05:01 pm (UTC)Fuck, Feej. Why don't you just go out to your local school board and tell them they don't need to fund English classes while there's Blockbuster down the highway? Maybe start denying the validity of evolution while you're at it, or start explaining that no teenager needs sex ed. Enjoy your slope. I see that it's slippery.
I mean, bitching because people want to *read*. If you want to talk about things that would make the world a better place...
I'd also try to explain to you the strong developing theme in the series about the necessity of participating in political systems and world events rather than leaving things to bureaucratic careerists, but I don't think you'd listen if I did.
Re: Who's the spaz again?
Date: 2005-07-16 05:08 pm (UTC)HAWWW YEAH, I'M THE DOWNFALL OF CIVILIZATION!
Re: Who's the spaz again?
Date: 2005-07-16 05:10 pm (UTC)Babe, we've known that for YEARS.
Re: Who's the spaz again?
Date: 2005-07-16 05:15 pm (UTC)...or the Cubs win the World Series. You know, whichever comes first.
Re: Who's the spaz again?
Date: 2005-07-16 05:18 pm (UTC)Re: Who's the spaz again?
Date: 2005-07-17 02:41 am (UTC)And I know who dies: THEY ALL DO EVENTUALLY BUT IN SOME CASES NOT FOR A FEW DECADES THOUGH EXCEPT FOR DUMBLEDORE BECAUSE OF THE PHILOSOPHER'S STONE HE LIVES TO BE 387823 YEARS OLD
Re: Who's the spaz again?
Date: 2005-07-16 05:46 pm (UTC)What he complained about was the massive pre-emptive strike of obnoxiousness of a million people crying out "no spoilers". It's kind of like Las Vegas driving down your street, lights blazing, to say "Don't forget to fed your cat!" There is such thing as overkill, this was overkill, just like taking out a Photomat with a cruise missile would be.
Re: Who's the spaz again?
Date: 2005-07-16 07:24 pm (UTC)It was as if a million voices cried out for no spoilers, and then were suddenly silenced.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 05:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 10:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-17 03:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-17 03:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-17 05:20 am (UTC)Some dumbass on some social MUSH I chat on leaked a really large spoiler without a spoiler warning out of nowhere because he thought -everyone- knew already because of course, it was such a huge deal to him. There are dumb fucks out there who just don't think beyond themselves unless battered incessantly with reminders.
So yeah, now I know something I would rather not have known because someone did spoil something for me. Call it childish, whatever.